Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to Note

[Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>]

I second that motion.

---

From: Wunder, John A. <jwunder@mitre.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 3:02:31 PM
To: Bret Jordan; cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to Note

 

I’m fine either way, so if you all have already talked about it and agree then I would like to move that if we don’t hear any dissent in the next week that we make this change.

 

From: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Bret Jordan (CS)" <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 4:33 PM
To: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to Note

 

All,

 

As we look to using the new Intel-Note object to track Activity for events and other data/notes in STIX, it has became clear that the term intel-note is probably not general enough.  We talked on slack yesterday with Allan and Jason and others about just renaming it to be a more general term called "Note". Everyone seemed to agree.  However, I just wanted to send this to the list to allow anyone that disagrees to comment.  

 

Bret