[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to Note
I second that motion.
From: Wunder, John A. <jwunder@mitre.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 3:02:31 PM
To: Bret Jordan; cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to NoteI’m fine either way, so if you all have already talked about it and agree then I would like to move that if we don’t hear any dissent in the next week that we make this change.
From: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org
> on behalf of "Bret Jordan (CS)" <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 4:33 PM
To: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org >
Subject: [cti-stix] Rename of Intel Note to Note
All,
As we look to using the new Intel-Note object to track Activity for events and other data/notes in STIX, it has became clear that the term intel-note is probably not general enough. We talked on slack yesterday with Allan and Jason and others about just renaming it to be a more general term called "Note". Everyone seemed to agree. However, I just wanted to send this to the list to allow anyone that disagrees to comment.
Bret
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]