OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti-stix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: Spec Version


Like the idea, agree that stix_version would be clearer.

-G

 

From: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Bret Jordan
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 4:47 PM
To: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [cti-stix] Spec Version

 

All,

 

For STIX 2.1 the TC decided to add a "spec_version" property to all objects (a property that will record the version of STIX to which the object conforms). I wonder if this property would be best renamed to "stix_version" instead of "spec_version".  I feel like "stix_version" might make it more clear what we are referring to, especially for non-native english speakers.

 

In STIX 2.0 we had "spec_version" on the Bundle, however, that has been removed from the Bundle in STIX 2.1.

 

I originally brought this up on slack, but wanted to make sure the broader TC could voice their opinion, especially those that do not natively speak english.

 

Bret  

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]