[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] TAXII Brainstorming
All - Sorry for the spam, but want to be clear on my intent: I'm not advocating any specific Messaging, Protocol Buffer, etc. approach over any other options.
My recommendations regarding MQTT were specifically to share learning opportunities with those interested in studying how other well organized OASIS TCs Operate (in terms of process, tools, frameworks). I am however interested in how they (and other
TCs) are addressing Security in their Standards.
Patrick Maroney
Office: (856)983-0001
Cell:: (609)841-5104
Email: pmaroney@specere.org
From: <cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Davidson II, Mark S" <mdavidson@mitre.org>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 11:24 AM To: "cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [cti-taxii] TAXII Brainstorming Jason, Thank you for making that point, and I agree wholeheartedly. The more open-minded we are, the better. -Mark From:
cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Keirstead One thing I'd like to raise... (note, currently I am neither pro nor con of the idea of using an MQ for TAXII 2.0, as it is obviously way too early in the discussion for that) I'd just like to ask that, lets not throw the baby (an
HTTP based protocol) out with the bath water just yet. There are various pros and cons for moving from HTTP to an MQ based solution, especially when considering the potential ramifications of large public internet-facing portals that wish to do threat sharing.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]