[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] TAXII Protocol Shortlist
So in the interest of spurring discussion, here are my thoughts:
HTTP 1.1 would be my preferred option:
HTTP 2 is intriguing, I can see how it would be nice. It seems like a trade-off: it’s not as well supported as HTTP 1.1 right now but that should be changing in the (near??) future. So given that it might be worth exploring it, and if nothing else adding
support or switching over in a future version of TAXII?
The various messaging protocols:
I’m not sure of the reasoning behind SMTP so I can’t really evaluate it.
John
From: <cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Jordan, Bret"
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 12:14 PM To: "cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org" Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] TAXII Protocol Shortlist Updated....
HTTP/1.1
HTTP/2
ZMTP
AMQP 0.9
AMQP 1.0
MQTT
SMTP
Please submit pros and cons for each of these and any others you think we should look at over the next 2 weeks. Also, if there is no discussion of pros/cons for a given item, then it will be dropped from the list. No reason for having it on
the list if there is no supporting data one way or another for it. So if you feel strongly about one of the above, or another yet to be added item, please do the research and identify why you think it would be a good option for us to go with and how it would
solve the TAXII problems we have identified and further, how it will meet the protocol requirements we have identified on the wiki.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]