[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-users] Towards a better understanding of JSON-LD (Was: MTI Binding)
I haven’t seen anybody suggest not having an abstract data model (either via RDF, UML, or something else). Bret in particular has been careful to maintain that we will base any serialization on a high-level model.
The question we’re tackling now is whether the on-the-wire MTI format should be something tied directly to RDF, like JSON-LD, or something that's indirectly tied to the high-level model via a binding specification, like JSON with JSONSchema. Both
approaches allow for an RDF-based analysis, it’s just a question of whether an RDF-based serialization format is the best approach for sharing data between tools when not all of them will want to do RDF.
FWIW I’m waiting to see what Cory’s examples look like.
John
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]