[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti] Inviting nominations for Chair of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC,
Hi all, Good discussions regarding leadership, very healthy. A couple of points regarding OASIS processes and transparency. There is one set of rules for all TCs,
posted online on the OASIS website, and I’d draw attention particularly to the IPR Policy and TC Process. “Chatham House” rules don’t apply. Every person is responsible for what they say and bring
to the table; no exceptions. Also, be careful with those automated signature lines at bottom of messages with confidentiality or other disclaimers. ALL mail sent to any OASIS TC list is publicly
accessible and archived; again, no exceptions. I’m not a lawyer but everyone needs to be aware of the (excellent) processes within which OASIS work proceeds. All the best, Peter
From: Doug DePeppe [mailto:doug@eosedgelegal.com]
All, Late to this discussion (and recent member addition), but I endorse Pete’s views. Perceptions about alliances and agendas would be counter-productive. I agree
there’s a need for a private sector co-leader, as well as global leadership representation. Governance and Chatham House-type rules would help, as transparency really matters. But additionally, ‘who’ is equally important to ‘how’ in building trust.
And, sometimes the Who can either be someone who’s established a reputation for trustworthiness and fair dealing, and/or someone who is not perceived as threatening because he/she is not affiliated with a large, multinational corporation.
My 2 cents. Looking forward to contributing and getting to know everyone. Doug Douglas M. DePeppe | Cyberlaw Attorney | LLM, JD EosEdge Legal | A Cyberlaw and Services Firm Cyberlaw at Catalyst Campus | 559 E. Pikes Peak Ave. Suite 101
Colorado Springs, CO 80903 This electronic mail transmission and any attachments contain information belonging to the sender which may be confidential and legally privileged. This information
is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this electronic mail transmission was sent as indicated above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of the information
contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately inform me by email and delete the message. Thank you. From:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Salwen, Jonathan E. All - +1 for Rich on Chair for 1 year term. Jon Salwen Enterprise Architect The MITRE Corp. 202 Burlington Rd
Bedford MA 01730 (781) 271-7172 From:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Joep Gommers My 0.02c: +1 for Rich on chair. We could def use industry as co-chair minimally. Although the work so far has been fantastic, it does often lack some real world application to market (which is different as real world implementation,
which also needs attention). Having European involvement for example chairing subgroups would help keep it alive and kicking. Even though we're basically road showing around Europe on behalf of STIX and TAXII, the implementors out here are pushing back hard
due to implementation complexity. Having extra goodwill out here will make allot of difference. Lastly we need a chair or cochair with significant time investment, Bret has shown he can invest this time and I like the no nonesence and lets go attitude. +1 there J Sent from my iPhone
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]