Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics

[Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>]

    No views here on when's best.  Certainly F2F time is precious for tech progress.  Looking forward to the implications-of-legislation chat, and calling in to listen, when you do have it.
    Cordially  Jamie

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Barnum, Sean D. <sbarnum@mitre.org> wrote:

While I agree with Tony that the topic is very important I would also agree with Bret here that this may best be done on one of our calls rather than f2f.

Our f2f time will be very precious.

sean

Personally, I think this sort of discussion or presentation would be best done via one of our normal monthly calls.  I would not want to use expensive F2F time for something that can easily be done via a phone call.  IMHO, F2F time should be reserved for things that are painful to do remotely, over the phone, or over email.  

Thanks,

On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:49, Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> wrote:

    Thanks from us for this also, Tony.    The legislation does indeed provide a whole bunch of new issues for info sharing -- but on the technical side, it certainly does look like a paved sidewalk to STIX/TAXII.  * * *

   
James Bryce Clark, General Counsel
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
https://www.oasis-open.org/staff
www.twitter.com/JamieXML
http://www.slideshare.net/jamiexml
Recent:  http://j.mp/globalcyber (OASIS-World Bank cybersec conference)
Recent:  http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=66370 (UBL approved by ISO/IEC)

On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> wrote:

Hi Mark,

Happy New Year.

Two weeks ago, a rather significant and fast
moving "baby" was left at our collective doorstep
in the form of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015.  * * *