OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics

We are working on that now.  Look for something in the next few days.



Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Jan 4, 2016, at 13:04, Bush, Jonathan <jbush@dtcc.com> wrote:

Have we published any draft agenda for the meeting yet?  I may have missed it with the craziness of the holidays.
From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Jason Keirstead
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 2:10 PM
To: tony@yaanatech.com
Cc: Jamie Clark; Mark Davidson; Rich Struse; cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics

My own $0.02 - I have always seen the F2F as an opportunity to close off on some long-discussion threads on the email list in a more cogent forum, and also an opportunity to deep-dive into some other very technical topics that are difficult to discuss over email in a timely fashion. My question on this is, is there enough "technical meat" here to warrant taking time away from other topics? I am not sure there is. 

Yes, the act is very important from a logistical POV. But what, if any, are the explicit technical implications here to STIX? I have read through the act and also Tony's reference model PPT and I am not sure there are any actual explicit implications. If so, what are they? The act as worded does not get into the level of detail on sharing mechanisms that it would have relevance to STIX in my opinion.

I guess what I am saying - if we would spend significant time here - I would like to see a more detailed description of what would be discussed here at a technical level, as it isn't clear to me.

Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown 

<image001.gif>Tony Rutkowski ---01/04/2016 03:01:26 PM---That should read, of course, "...a topic more important..." unless one regards the Act and its imple

From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
To: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
Cc: Mark Davidson <mdavidson@soltra.com>, Rich Struse <richard.struse@dhs.gov>, cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 01/04/2016 03:01 PM
Subject: Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics
Sent by: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>

That should read, of course, "...a topic more important..."
unless one regards the Act and its implementation as irrelevant.

On 2016-01-04 1:58 PM, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> a F2F topic less important and time critical

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.  The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]