[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti] CybOX Datatype Refactoring/Deprecation
So I have no strong emotion on whether we do Base64 on the objects or the STIX package , but would argue for the package itself. Again, key point for the assertion is it is (1) simple to implement and (2) provides an effective mechanism for preventing
unintentional outcomes when passing "Live Ammo" on the wire. For those that make valid arguments that encryption of payloads equally solve this issue, please reach out directly for why mesh VPN/GRE/et al approaches do not scale for widespread distributed
partitioned security infrastructure.
Which of the Cybox objects are you recommending be Base64 encoded, just those that may contain binaries?
From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Patrick Maroney
In addition to the up or down motion to pass "truth on the wire", I make a motion to add (2) Base64 encoding of STIX/Cybox content "on the wire" as a "Must" requirement for low impact/high effectiveness method to minimize impacts of handling "Live Ammo" within STIX Packahes as they are passed between systems, applications, APIs, etc.. Patrick Maroney
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:22 PM -0800, "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <alexander.foley@bankofamerica.com> wrote: I second the motion and will open the ballot today.
Thanks,
Alex Foley
From: Jordan, Bret [mailto:bret.jordan@bluecoat.com]
The co-chairs and Rich discussed this issue and issues like it at length this morning. The conclusion we came up with is that it appears that there is general consensus. However, to be sure, we are going to propose that when issues like this get this muddy, that we just open a simple vote to see if we have official consensus so we can just move on, and stop having circular discussions.
Alex, I therefor motion that we open a ballot on this issue. Namely "Should STIX and CybOX support the ability to capture content in a defanged form and thus also include the ability to track that yes it was defanged and how it was defanged"
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message. This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you. Aetna
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]