Re: [cti] timestamp proposal for STIX 2.0 RC3

["Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>]

I support option 1. I also think JMG is probably right that we should pick a particular epoch definition but I don’t know what the right one would be.

On 12/2/16, 8:55 AM, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Kirillov, Ivan A." <cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of ikirillov@mitre.org> wrote:

    I support option #1 as well.
    
    Regards,
    Ivan
    
    On 12/2/16, 4:06 AM, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Mr. Stefan Hagen" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of stefan@hagen.link> wrote:
    
        On 01.12.2016 22:19:27, Allan Thomson wrote:
        >
        > Proposal #1 is the preferred approach but including 2 options for
        > consideration to see if others have a different preference.
        
        I support option #1:
        JSON Number format, UNIX Epoch with an optional fractional component, separated by the decimal character "."
        
        All the best at 1480676728.022066t,
        Stefan.