[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Internationalization: lang field required or optional?
I think I am coming around to Jason's views.. But I do have a few concerns with our one-size fits all approach. Namely, I do not think the "lang" property should be on the "Common Properties" for all objects. Because it does not make any sense to have it on the Observed Data or Sighting objects. There are no string fields on these objects that allow for human generated content.
I can also see how for things like Indicators, where the vast majority of indicators will have nothing to translate, that the "lang" field should be Optional. This makes a lot of sense. Where I still find myself on the fence is with higher level intelligence. This is usually always human generated and I feel it would be within reason to make "lang" required for these objects.
Bret
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]