Re: [cti] concerns about 'artifact' object's payload_bin property size limit(<=10MB) of STIX 2.0

["Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>]

I don't think this will help. 

Even in the future 2049 nirvana where
everyone in the world runs IPv6, companies will still have firewalls.

-
Jason Keirstead
STSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown




From:      
 Jerome Athias <jerome.athias@protonmail.com>
To:      
 Cheolho Lee <chlee@nsr.re.kr>,
cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 08/29/2017 11:48 AM
Subject:    
   Re: [cti] concerns
about 'artifact' object's payload_bin property size limit(<=10MB) of
STIX 2.0
Sent by:    
   <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

Candide question there but is assuming an IPv6 address
for each device could be of any help there? 
Kindle just ignore if irrelevant  


On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Cheolho Lee <chlee@nsr.re.kr>
wrote:
I think that many client-side security equipments are
running behind NATs in organizations. So, it is impossible or very difficult
for them to open a listening port for URL connections from outside. --
Maybe, if possible(with port-forwarding of NATs and so on), it will be
a degration of security level of organizations. I agree with Trey's opinion
in the earlier post. -- additional property for archived type and ordering
for multiple archive files for a large file. Regards, Cheolho Lee.