Re: [NEWSLETTER] [cti] Re: [EXT] [cti] Re: Question about combinatorial extension

[aa tt <atcyber1000@gmail.com>]

Do we have an agreed place in the spec for such best practice guidance?

My guess would be to just put additional text in Section 7 where the extension object is introduced where we already talk about the different types of extension mechanisms the spec supports.

If I get time, I will try to add some color to the combinatorial section in there. Feel free to contribute :-)


Allan

> On Oct 12, 2020, at 7:21 AM, Trey Darley <trey.darley@cert.be> wrote:
> 
> Allan gave a concrete example on last week's working call. I agree
> that adding some guidance around recommended practices would be
> helpful. Adding one or more real world examples (along the lines of
> what Allan described on the call) would be equally helpful.
> 
> Cheers,
> Trey
> 
> On 08.10.2020 16:04:01, Paul Patrick wrote:
>> I could definitely see the value when bundling.  I think what we
>> might want to do is provide some guidance around when its best to
>> use each approach, kind of âbest practicesâ.  I suspect that would
>> also help to get people to use the capability in a more consistent
>> manner.
>> 
>> Paul Patrick
>> 
> 
> --
> Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit. --Seneca
> --
> CERT.be / Centre for Cyber Security Belgium
> Mail: trey.darley@cert.be
> GPG: CA5B 29E4 937E 151E 2550  6607 AE9A 7FF2 8000 0E4E
> Web: https://www.cert.be
> --
> Under the authority of the Prime Minister
> rue de la Loi 16/Wetstraat 16, 1000 Brussels - Belgium

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP