Re: [cxs] Swagger / REST endpoint workflow proposal

[Thomas Sigdestad <tsi@enonic.com>]

Makes sense Chris, especially if we are able to pick up the pace!

I guess our biggest problem right now is progress? I would at least say that if anyone have time to work outside of a workgroup they should do pull requests, within a workgroup we are already at least two people and should be able to commit?

Vennlig hilsen/Best regards

Enonic AS

Thomas Sigdestad

CTO

+47 98236011

https://enonic.com - A web operating system for your sites and applications

On 15 Jun 2016, at 18:06, Christophe Laprun <claprun@jahia.com> wrote:

Hi folks,

I was thinking about how we could improve our workflow while working on the swagger specification and thought that it might be interesting to leverage Github's Pull Request mechanism to gather work and keep an history of what’s been done along with comments and decisions. For example, each workgroup could clone the “official” swagger document and create a pull request for each work item. We would then vote and discuss the issues using github before merging the PRs to the official version. This would also help record alternative ideas and facilitate the review process during monthlies. Another benefit would be to allow working on the spec in a more asynchronous way (providing we each could find time to work on it outside of scheduled meetings).

What do you think?

Best regards,

Christophe Laprun
Senior Software Engineer

8 rue du Sentier | 75002 Paris | France

jahia.com

SKYPE | LINKEDIN | TWITTER | VCARD

> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY to evaluate, get trained and to discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital Transformation.