[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-adoption-fasc] Fwd: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements
Hi, Carol I hadn't appreciated the connection. Many thanks, David > Yes, this was resolved, as I reported on 3/24. > > OASIS IT has created a new role, 'contributing user'. As 'editors', > members > of the SC can grant the 'contributing user' role to trustworthy > people who > are not on the Subcommittee, so their posts will never be flagged as > spam. > > I made Debbie a 'contributed user' and let her know. > > --Carol > > -----Original Message----- > From: David J. B. Hollis [mailto:dhollis@AandOConsultancy.ltd.uk] > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:13 AM > To: Carol Geyer > Cc: DITA Adoption FASC > Subject: Re: [dita-adoption-fasc] Fwd: [dita-users] Re: xref > requirements > > Dear Carol > > This issue is now more than a month old, so I'm sure it's all been > resolved. > > Would it be possible to have an update for the DITA Adoption FASC, > please? > Were any issues identified? Are there any lessons to be learnt? > > Many thanks, > David > > >> Debbie, >> We are terribly sorry you've had problems with DITA XML.org. We're >> working to fix it now. >> >> Can you help us clarify what actually occurred? There seem to be >> comments from you at >> http://dita.xml.org/forum/requirements-thread-xref >> >> Was there a delay in posting those or did you create others that were >> rejected or did you get a message after posting those that indicated >> they were rejected? >> >> Thanks, >> Carol >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David J. B. Hollis [mailto:dhollis@AandOConsultancy.ltd.uk] >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:25 AM >> To: DITA Adoption Focus Area SC >> Subject: [dita-adoption-fasc] Fwd: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: "Deborah Pickett" <debbiep-list-ditausers@futzle.com> >>> Date: 27 February 2009 03:56:49 GMT >>> To: dita-users@yahoogroups.com >>> Subject: [dita-users] Re: xref requirements >>> Reply-To: dita-users@yahoogroups.com >>> >>>>> http://dita.xml.org/forum/requirements-thread-xref >>> >>> Forget it . . . In two attempts I've had two long, carefully worded, >>> messages eaten by dita.xml.org's spam filter. I can't afford to >>> waste that kind of time when I can't even be sure that my comments >>> are going to be seen. >>> >>> I will happily continue the discussion here on dita-users, but >>> dita.xml.org can go filter itself into oblivion.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]