dita-learningspec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain
- From: john_hunt@us.ibm.com
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:13:42 -0400
Hi Kris and L&T members -
Based on the inputs received, the consensus
is to not include the Release Mgt Domain in the default content models
for the L&T topics and maps, and treat as optional in the same way
that the other tech-comm domains are optional.
Thanks.
John
___________________________________
John Hunt
Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-Committee
Senior Technical Content Architect
IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence
4502 S. Miami Blvd, Durham, NC 27703
john_hunt@us.ibm.com
From:
"Myers, Mark"
<mark.myers@sap.com>
To:
"Burgess, Doug"
<doug.burgess@sap.com>
Cc:
"john_hunt@us.ibm.com"
<john_hunt@us.ibm.com>, "dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org"
<dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org>, Kristen James Eberlein
<kris@eberleinconsulting.com>
Date:
03/19/2014 01:23 PM
Subject:
Re: [dita-learningspec]
Learning content and the Release mgt domain
Sent by:
<dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org>
Hi All from sunny Germany,
I agree with Doug and John, that would be consistent with
the approach for the other domains.
Cheers
Mark
On Mar 19, 2014, at 5:24 PM, "Burgess, Doug" <doug.burgess@sap.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I’m inclined to agree with
John. Let users add the domain if they have a use-case for it.
It helps maintain the simplicity
of L&T, (or at least the appearance of it ;-) if adopters see a relatively
uncluttered core implementation.
Best Regards,
Doug
=======================================
Doug Burgess
Business Platform Management
and Operations
Knowledge & Enablement
Solutions, SAP Canada
doug.burgess@sap.com
Work: 604-974-2334 Mobile:
778-840-8004
Vancouver BC
Canada
From: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of john_hunt@us.ibm.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:01 AM
To: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Kristen James Eberlein
Subject: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain
Dear L&T Sub-committee members and list
-
DITA 1.3 will include a new "Release management domain," which
is described in this Stage 3 proposal - https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/50971/13102_Stage3Proposal.pdf.
Essentially, this domain is included with the Technical-content domain
elements and provides additional metadata elements (11 by my count) for
tracking content changes, including the person, organization, summary of
the change, and key dates.
Kris has asked if we want it included or not with the default content models
for the L&T topics.
My personal take is that since the default L&T content models do not
include the other Tech-content domains, such as programming or software
elements, or the new equation, mathml, and svg domains, that we keep the
Release mgt domain optional as well. This leaves it to the implementers
to decide, based on the content types and mgt systems they use.
What do others think? Please get back to me with your input by the
end of the day this Friday if possible, so we can get back to the Kris
and the TC with a recommendation.
Thanks much in advance!
John
___________________________________
John Hunt
Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-Committee
Senior Technical Content Architect
IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence
4205 S. Miami Blvd, Durham, NC 27703
john_hunt@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]