[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita-s1000d-discuss] Kicking off the New Year
To respond to Scott's solicitation below, I was taking the 3rd approach by suggesting that we develop some realistic interoperability scenarios first (see http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-s1000d-discuss/200701/msg00002.html). I think that anything we do here should be driven by the real use cases that would bring business value to the industry, not by the wants of a group of IT professionals. For example, we need to ask ourselves this question: "What is the real use cases (and the associated business value) for making provisions for the round-trip (content interchange) between DITA and S1000D?"
Regards,
Scott
Tsao
Enterprise
Architecture and Integration
The
Boeing Company
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Hudson
[mailto:scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:27 PM
To: Chet Ensign
Cc:
dita-s1000d-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [dita-s1000d-discuss]
Kicking off the New Year
Thanks, Chet!
I also want to make
provisions for the round-trip. I'm not sure if the DITA SC could extend it's
scope to include producing a transform to take DITA content to an
S1000D-compatible form? (then again, if it is specified in the charter, perhaps
it could)
Thoughts?
--Scott
Chet Ensign wrote:
>
Happy New Year Scott. I lean towards a subcommittee since this is, in
>
effect, a subset of broader DITA activities. The TC already has 3 in
>
place to address other specialized concerns. This topic also looks
> like
a similar sort of initiative.
>
> Best,
>
>
/chet
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hudson
[mailto:scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 1:00 PM
> To:
dita-s1000d-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dita-s1000d-discuss]
Kicking off the New Year
>
>
> Folks,
>
> thank
you for your introductions and active discussions this past
> December
regarding DITA and S1000D interoperability.
>
> I'd like to kick off
the New Year with an informal poll.
>
> Given the strong potential
for alignment between S1000D and DITA,
> would you
support:
> 1) the formation of a Technical Committee at
OASIS to move forward
> with the detailed mapping work and technical
artifacts, or
> 2) would you rather support the
formation of a SubCommittee as part
> of the existing OASIS DITA TC to
handle this work, or
> 3) are there other suggestions as
to how to move forward on this effort?
>
> The charter of this
discussion list is limited to what could be done
> in a TC/SC and proposed
charter development, though I would also like
> to use this discussion
list as a way of collecting relevant available
> information on these
standards as well.
>
> Best regards and Happy New
Year,
>
> --Scott
>
>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]