[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Attribute Generalization
Looking at the proposal, hierarchical values are already covered. In that syntax props="proglanguage(Java) audience(CompanyA/student CompanyB/teacher))" means proglanguage="java" audience="CompanyA/student CompanyB/teacher" Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul.prescod@blastradius.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:54 AM To: Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [dita] Attribute Generalization > From: Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) [mailto:esrig@lucent.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:43 AM > Subject: RE: [dita] Attribute Generalization > > Although it would make it more difficult to support DITA, I > have a conflicting urge, which is to allow even more > expressive power ... > > props="proglanguage(Java) audience(CompanyA(student) > CompanyB(teacher))" But what does that mean? Just the same as: proglanguage="java" audience="student teacher" Or proglanguage="java" CompanyA="student" CompanyB="teacher" Or something else altogether? > A compromise would be to put declarations of attributes into > the props attribute, and then have processors that support > extensibility look in those attributes for the values. I think that according to the proposal, declarations go in the domains attribute. Paul Prescod
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]