Re: [dita] conref sequence issue, proposed rewording in spec

["W. Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>]

Michael Priestley wrote:
>  >>>
> The result should preserve without generalization all elements that are 
> valid in the originating context, even if they are not valid in an 
> intermediate context. For example, if topicA and topicC allow 
> highlighting, and topicB does not, then a content reference chain of 
> topicA->topicB->topicC should preserve any highlighting elements in the 
> referenced content. The result is the same as if the conref pairs are 
> resolved recursively starting from the source element.
>  >>>

I agree with Michael's proposal.

Cheers,

Eliot

-- 
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(214) 954-5198

ekimber@innodata-isogen.com
www.innodata-isogen.com