[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20 November 2007
Please be sure to review proposals that are pending design approval vote and send comments to the list ahead of next week's meeting. PENDING VOTES ------------- The following items will be voted upon at the next TC meeting: 1. #12026 - Enhance the Glossary specialization (Warburton, Hennum, et al.) * http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/26130/IssueGlossary12026.html Gershon L Joseph Director of Technology and Single Sourcing Tech-Tav Documentation Ltd. Secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Secretary, OASIS DITA Translation Subcommittee Member, OASIS DocBook Technical Committee +972-8-974-1569 (direct) +972-57-314-1170 (mobile) http://www.tech-tav.com
DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20 November 2007 Chaired by Don Day <dond@us.ibm.com> Recorded by Gershon Joseph <gershon@tech-tav.com> PENDING VOTES ------------- The following items will be voted upon at the next TC meeting: 1. #12026 - Enhance the Glossary specialization (Warburton, Hennum, et al.) * http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/26130/IssueGlossary12026.html ------------- The DITA Technical Committee met on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 at 08:00am PT for 60 minutes. 1. Roll call We have quorum. 2. Approve minutes from previous business meeting: * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00020.html (13 November 2007) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00023.html (amendment) Accepted by acclamation. 3. Business: 1. ITEM: Proposals for Design Approval vote: None this week 2. ITEM: Review prepared proposals: 1. Check status of ITEM: #12007 - Indirect reference/keyref proposal (Ogden et al.) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00053.html * Most recent comments--this and earlier * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00075.html Jeff not on call this week. Michael says it's in good shape. ACTION: MP to contact Jeff to set up phone call for next week. Revisit next week. 2. ITEM: #12011 - Generic Task Type (Houser) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00005.html * Most recent comment: * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00007.html (Houser) Alan: I've been struggling on this one because the possible solutions have ramifications. We'd need to change the content model for <task>, which would result in migration issues. The other approach (the one originally proposed) is to create another task type. I feel this would breed confusion; the two info types would overlap. A third approach is leveraging the new constraints mechanism to create a more generic task and step model and allow constrainers to constrain it. I have not thought this approach through yet and would appreciate input from TC members about possible ramifications. EH is in favor of opening up task and then constraining it to get the more constrained one. MP: There is a limit as to how much we can achieve via constraints. For example, the use case to allow text directly in <step> would not be supported via the constraints approach. If we relax <step> to allow text, we'd loose all the info model on the base step and allow any number or order of cmd, and other elements. We would be giving up sequence and number control. Suggested <simplestep> (suggestions for a better name are welcome) as an option to retain the current content model and also provide a solution for the use cases. EH: The more general version could make available additional elements that could be constrained away (e.g. simplestep). Discussion on how best to handle multiple steps; how best to preserve the current content model structure. Summary: We're talking about expanding the existing task model and then having a second DTD to constrain it back to the current task model. ACTION: AH to continue working on the proposal. Revisit next week. 3. Hennum comment on following updates: * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00028.html No major changes to either proposal. * ITEM #12026 - Enhance the Glossary specialization (Warburton, Hennum, et al.) * http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/26130/IssueGlossary12026.html (updated) DECISION to put this proposal to design approval vote next week. EH requested everyone to look over the proposal. * ITEM #12047 - add convenience elements for composing maps that set attribute defaults (Hennum, Kimber, et al.) * http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/26129/IssueMapConveniences12047.html EH: The TC members are requested to review this item. ACTION: TC members are requested to comment on this proposal on-list. Revisit next week. 4. Updated ITEM #12035 - Generic collation element (Pickett) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00026.html MP reminded the TC that the proposal for a generic universal collation element was deemed to be too extreme considering DITA does not support collation at this time. The TC had previously asked DP to come back with a new proposal to split off topic collation for DITA 1.2 and save the rest of her proposal for a later DITA release. The TC is still waiting for a revised proposal from DP that meets the requirements the TC requested (topic only for now). The current proposal covers the entire spectrum that was rejected by the TC for DITA 1.2 scope. ACTION: Don to contact DP to enquire why the disposition and the requirements document is not addressed in her proposal. Revisit after DP has responded to Don's request for clarification. 3. ITEM: Discussion on Controlled values, #collection-type enumerations and glossaries * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00024.html (Pickett) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00029.html (Hennum reply) EH: DP wants to address the issue of identifying a list that's collatable. Currently she is using @outputclass because she didn't want to specialize. The contrary perspective is it's more serious to make processing expectations extensible rather than making the core attributes extensible. DP wants to be able to extend the values in any enumeration. Discussion on how controlled values addresses this issue. e.g. glossary part of speech should be an extensible enumeration. The Learning SC also has a number or enumerations that should be handled that way. Also note type (Machine Industry SC). DP would like to extend this to collection-type. Or should we replace collection-type? CK clarified that we are not opening up note, we are just completing the list of note types. We don't want to open it up (only to make the available list of values to include all the ANSI values that are currently missing). EH: If we agree to the keys and controlled values proposals, then the question is how many or which enumerations do we bring in? Maybe all? MP suggested we should get a list of all enumerations so we can decide. We're hitting scope creep; and how quickly can vendors cope with the controlled values processing? Discussion on how much of a pain this would be for the tools (XML editors). The TC noted we must get feedback from the tool vendors before making a decision on how quickly to migrate enumerations into controlled values. ACTION: EH to send a message to the list listing the enumerations and soliciting vendor input. 4. ITEM: URI Scheme for TC Subcommittees (Sirois) * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00000.html * Amended design patter, as requested last week: * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200711/msg00032.html (Sirois) * Is this ready for adoption/recommendation for specializers? How formal? Don: How do we communicate this as a best practice for adopters? EH clarified: The issue is how do SC specializations label their work as work of the SC. It's not for non-OASIS specializers. Don: Is it a recommendation or design pattern for the SCs to use? Robin: For naming conventions, we've found that recommendation or guidelines are best. DECISION: The TC accepted ES's guidelines for URI naming conventions of contributed work. --Out of time. Meeting adjourned.-- 5. ITEM: Request approval of Translation SC paper: (Pass today for expected update) * Best Practice for Using the DITA Conref attribute for Translation 6. ITEM: Review of "Items for discussion" list in the Frontpage * How much flexibility for specializers? 4. Announcements/Opens
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]