OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [dita] Section Div in LI?

Hi - just to aid in discussion of the item, here is the proposal that was
approved Nov 13, 2007:

The only changes were slight amendments on April 29, 2008 explicitly
calling out conbodydiv, refbodydiv, and approving the addition of
sectiondiv to other section specializations:

Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit

Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> wrote on 05/26/2009 09:43:35 AM:
> [dita] Section Div in LI?
> On Friday, in the context of designing a new specialization for a client,
> noticed that section-div is not allowed within li.
> I'm not sure what the finally-approved proposal said but it was certainly
> intent/assumption that section-div would be allowed essentially anywhere
> is allowed.
> By that logic, I would be inclined to argue that the lack of section-div
> li (and similar elements, e.g., dd, etc.) is a bug. Having forgotten the
> original discussion and thinking only of the base semantics of
> I found it surprising that it was not included in li.
> I'm not making a proposal at this time but would like to discuss the
> to determine if it is really a bug or if the proposal as approved
> dealt with this case.
> Cheers,
> E.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]