dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: problem with packaging of glossaries
- From: "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com>
- To: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:24:27 -0400
This came up in the spec authoring meeting today.
The problem: <glossentry> is specialized from
<concept>. <task>, <concept>, and <reference> are in the
TechDocs package. This forces <glossentry> etc. to be restricted to the TD
package. But non-TechDocs folks need glossaries, and support for them
should be in the base.
Two solutions:
- Accept this. Present it as an unfortunate fait
accompli for 1.2 -- if you want a glossary, you have to use the TD package (or
specialize your own).
- Move <task>, <concept>, and
<reference> back into the base, sans TD-specific domain specializations,
and include those specializations in the TD package. Present this as an
interim step toward simplified topics being developed by the BusDocs
SC.
Comment? Action?
/Bruce
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]