Re: [dita] Under-specification for @refcol?

[ekimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 9/2/09 8:49 AM, "Michael Priestley" <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com> wrote:

> It might be something we could tackle in the automated linking proposal
> now slated for 1.3. I wouldn't touch it for 1.2 at this stage.

I think it's fair to say that the information in the spec in insufficient to
guide any sort of implementation. Might be better to change it's description
to "Reserved for future use." to make it clear it's in support of an
undefined feature at this point.

Cheers,

E.
----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>