[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Issue: glossary.dtd does not conform to 1.2 specfilenaming rules
On 9/2/09 4:25 PM, "Joann Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com> wrote: > Actually, I'd much rather have the module named "glossary" rather than > "glossentry." I think "glossentry" is confusing for everybody. I never > remember that that is where I'm supposed to start. In general, the whole > thing needs to be fixed for 1.3 > JoAnn The problem is that the topic type is named "glossentry", which is an accurate name (it contains exactly one glossary entry), so "glossary" is definitely the wrong name for that module. There is a need for a new topic type "glossary" that represents a set of glossary entries or glossary groups. Not sure why that wasn't part of the original design. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]