Re: [dita] Issue: glossary.dtd does not conform to 1.2 specfilenaming rules

[ekimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 9/2/09 4:25 PM, "Joann Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com> wrote:

> Actually, I'd much rather have the module named "glossary" rather than
> "glossentry." I think "glossentry" is confusing for everybody. I never
> remember that that is where I'm supposed to start. In general, the whole
> thing needs to be fixed for 1.3
> JoAnn

The problem is that the topic type is named "glossentry", which is an
accurate name (it contains exactly one glossary entry), so "glossary" is
definitely the wrong name for that module.

There is a need for a new topic type "glossary" that represents a set of
glossary entries or glossary groups. Not sure why that wasn't part of the
original design. 

Cheers,
E.


----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>