[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Why There are Constraints on Conref
On 9/24/09 4:55 PM, "Su-Laine Yeo" <su-laine.yeo@justsystems.com> wrote: > Many interesting issues are being raised, and I just want to address one > of the memes before it spreads: > > > > "Architects could very well try to take advantage of the constraint > mechanism as a means of improving the usability of the authoring > templates. > In so doing, under the current proposal, they would be rendering their > content unusable outside of their environment." > > > > As I understand the spec, architects who add constraints do not have to > worry about making their content unusable to others. You can conref > more-constrained content into less-constrained document types. Correct. They might be making content outside their environment unusable *by them* but they would not be making their content unusable to others who use fewer constraints. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]