[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] conref source and target [was: Why There are Constraintson Conref]
On 10/1/09 3:16 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> wrote: > Gotta appreciate the sense of humor! > > But the locus of mischief isn't actually at the conref-bearing element, > is it? > > Maybe too verbose as handy labels, but we are talking about the > conref-bearing element and the content-bearing element. I had to read that twice to realize that "conref-bearing" and "content-bearing" were different words. "r" and "f" and "t" are too similar in shape... Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]