OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [dita] dtds are normative?

I don't think such a statement is needed where you are working.

A general statement along these lines should be inclued somewhere, perhaps as part of the conformance statement.

And, of course, if there shouldn't be any conflicts between the DTDs, the Arch Spec. and the Language Spec. If we know of some, we should fix something.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: seth.park@freescale.com [mailto:seth.park@freescale.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 7:14 PM
> To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dita] dtds are normative?
> In the arch spec, we're describing the different rules for @id
> uniqueness, value restrictions, requirements, etc.
> I want to say "see the lang spec for element-specific declarations"....
> Do I need to add a note that the dtd rule when there is a conflict
> between the dtds and the lang spec?
> -sp

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]