[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Why does <glossgroup> not allow <titlealts>?
I think the reasoning is flawed: content from the base should be allowed unless there's some irrefutable reason to disallow it. For example, I might want to have separate navigation titles or search titles for my glossary groups, for example to reflect the specific glossary when I have many glossaries (and thus many glossary groups) in my search repository. Shortdesc and body I can agree with--if the primary intent of <glossgroup> is to be generated and thus would not normally have any way to get a short description, abstract, or body or if the intent is to impose constraints so that tools can safely assume that a glossary group could only hold glossary entries. But if <glossgroup> is just a specialization of <topic> with the semantic "groups glossary entries for some purpose" then leaving those elements out cannot be justified because you cannot presume how that very general semantic might be applied. In general, we need to be very careful not to impose any constraints that are very strongly motivated. Cheers, E. On 2/8/12 3:47 PM, "Robert D Anderson" <robander@us.ibm.com> wrote: > My memory is that the <glossgroup> was envisioned pretty much as a > container for glossary entries, with no extra content -- title because it > is required, and metadata because it lets you set the metadata once for all > the entries. So there was no reason seen for titlealts, shortdesc, or body > content. Those optional content elements were all left out, because nobody > suggested a reason for them. > > No opinion offered here on whether that is still true, I'd be interested to > see some reasons on how titlealts can / should be used. > > Robert D Anderson > IBM Authoring Tools Development > Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit > > <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 02/08/2012 16:31:22: > >> From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> >> To: dita <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> >> Date: 02/08/2012 16:33 >> Subject: [dita] Why does <glossgroup> not allow <titlealts>? >> Sent by: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> >> >> I just noticed that <glossgroup>, which is is a topic specialization, > does >> not allow <titlealts>. >> >> Is this a bug or was there some considered reason for leaving <titlealts> >> out? >> >> Off the top of my head I can't think of any reason to leave it out and > many >> reasons to require it. >> >> Cheers, >> >> E. >> >> -- >> Eliot Kimber >> Senior Solutions Architect >> "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" >> Main: 512.554.9368 >> www.reallysi.com >> www.rsuitecms.com > -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]