review of Proposal #13078

[Nancy <nancylph@gmail.com>]

Hi,

[note; I originally sent this to the TC list via my regular email account a few hours ago, but it didn't show up, so I'm sending it through the OASIS web site; if it ends up showing up twice, my apologies.]

After looking at #13078, I have the following comments

table[@orient]
 - Like David, I also wonder if 'port' and 'land' are the right names for these 
attribute values.  I noticed David suggested using the full words 
portrait/landscape, but there's also the fact that if a document is 
itself in landscape mode, either of those variants would be confusing. 
Maybe 'standard' or 'normal' and 'rotate'?  That would connect this with
 the entry/@rotate attribute as well.
Other than that, I like David's suggestion of adding the text from the original proposal back into the spec language.

entry[@rotate] - I agree with David; rather than '1' and '0', I'd 
prefer to use 'yes' and 'no'.   Most users are neither mathematicians 
nor engineers.

Thanks, Chris, for getting the implementation out. 

Regards,
Nancy Harrison

-- 
_____________
Nancy Harrison
Infobridge Solutions  
nharrison@infobridge-solutions.com