OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: Scoped Keys and Relationship Tables: I Think We Need to Say Something in the Spec


I built a sample set using Eliot’s suggested root map, and it is attached. It has the following directory structure:

 

rootmap.ditamap

topic-01.dita

submap-01

---- submap-01.ditamap

---- submap-02.ditamap

---- topic-01.dita

---- topic-02.dita

---- topic-03.dita

---- topic-03.dita

 

Here’s how I would expect the links to be resolved:

Links generated: A reciprocal link between topic-01.dita and submap-01/topic-02.dita. Note that sub01.topic-02 and sub01.topic-02 both resolve to topic-02.dita.

 

Submap-01

Links generated: A reciprocal link between submap-01/topic-02.dita and submap-01/submap-03.dita

 

Submap-02

Links generated: None. No key definition for “topic-03” exists in keyscope “sub02”.

 

Total effective links for the root map:

  • A reciprocal link between topic-01.dita and submap-01/topic-02.dita
  • A reciprocal link between submap-01/topic-02.dita and submap-01/submap-03.dita

 

What am I missing? Or does the markup in your sample map need to be modified so that <topicref keyref=”sub01.topic-02/> and <topicref keyref=”sub02.topic-02/> resolve to different DITA topics?

Best,

Kris

 

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Owner, Eberlein Consulting LLC
kris@eberleinconsulting.com

Skype: kriseberlein; voice: +1 (919) 622-1501

 

Attachment: root-map.zip
Description: root-map.zip



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]