[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
Hi I have the following docbook source which seems to vaildate okay. <article> <title>Article Title</title> <articleinfo> <author> <firstname>Eric</firstname> <surname>Richardson</surname> </author> <copyright> <year>2000</year><holder>MilagroSoft Inc.</holder> </copyright> </articleinfo> <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <para>This is the abstract</para> </abstract> </article> The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from reading this group that the red means something special when the output of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely. html/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract. fo/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract. excerpt from fo. <fo:block color="red"><abstract><fo:block color="red"><title>Abstract</title></fo:block> Any help would be appreciated. Also, is there a DOCTYPE for fo? Eric :-)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC