Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?

[Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com>]

Norman Walsh wrote:
> 
> / Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say:
> | The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from
> | reading this group that the red means something special when the output
> | of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely.
> 
> Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the
> element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to
> happen.)
> 
> I'll take a look.

Thanks alot. I'm pretty new to this so it's a little overwelming. I
found the default red template today. If I'm not miss reading the DTD,
an abstract can be inside articleinfo or just at the top level of the
article.

Eric :-)