docbook-apps message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?

From: Rune Enggaard Jensen <r.e.jensen@bigfoot.com>
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:15:24 +0100

Norm wrote:

> Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the
> element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to
> happen.)
>
> I'll take a look.

Now you are at it, could you please look at <productnumber>? They are also
red in the PDF files I have tried to produce.

Best regards

    Rune Enggaard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

References:
- DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
  - From: Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com>
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC