[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
/ Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say: | Hi | I have the following docbook source which seems to vaildate okay. | <article> | <title>Article Title</title> [...] | The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from | reading this group that the red means something special when the output | of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely. | | html/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract. | fo/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract. | | excerpt from fo. | <fo:block color="red"><abstract><fo:block | color="red"><title>Abstract</title></fo:block> | | Any help would be appreciated. Fixed. Sorry for the delay. | Also, is there a DOCTYPE for fo? Not really. It's hard to do because of the nature of inheritance in properties. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Extinction, n. The raw material out of http://nwalsh.com/ | which theology created the future | state.--Ambrose Bierce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC