[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: tetex and PassiveTeX in Red Hat (was Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: htmlcosmetics)
--OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:03:11AM -0800, Alex Lancaster wrote: > On this very subject, I'm working through getting a working > XSL/FO/PassiveTex setup working on my Red Hat 7.2 system, and > following the instructions above in "Chapter 2. Tools", it lists the > following dependencies available in Raw Hide: >=20 > libxml2 (at least 2.4.6-1) > libxslt > sgml-common and xml-common (at least 0.6.3-3) > tetex (at least 1.0.7-35) > xmltex > passivetex (at least 1.11-1) > docbook-style-xsl (at least 1.47-1) > docbook-dtd412-xml >=20 > All well and good, and I'm used to getting packages from Raw Hide, and > it's not normally a problem, but unfortunately tetex-1.0.7-35 is now > gone! (all of the other packages install fine). Again, not normally a > problem (after all it says "at least 1.0.7-35"), so it's been replaced > with 1.0.7-38, which again would be all fine and good, except that > it's been compiled with the new GCC (as noted in the changelog of Dec > 06). Yes, I know. I am looking at getting a newer teTeX package released as an enhancement/bugfix advisory soon. In the mean time I'll see if I can rebuild the rawhide teTeX against a 7.2 build tree. > So is there any way to smoothly install the necessary tools to use the > XSL/FO/PassiveTex toolchain short of wholesale committing to the > entire (unstable) distro of Raw Hide? =20 I have put everything except for teTeX here: <ftp://people.redhat.com/twaugh/docbook-pkgs/>. It should work against 7.2 (I'm using those packages here on a 7.2 machine). If there are dependencies I've missed, please let me know. > It would also be nice to be able to upgrade the binary without > having to fiddle around manually with the ".cnf" files in tetex, > which are just completely opaque to me [not being a great > TeX-pert].) You shouldn't need to. If you have modified the texmf.cnf file then you will find a texmf.cnf.rpmnew file after upgrade; just move the =2Erpmnew file over the .cnf file. Tim. */ --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8Fc2gyaXy9qA00+cRAmH9AJ4ovHY/gXnaqzS4qd0tsx6T4HGa2gCeLMpT SuQ1JLCJEhkcIk4k5VjRY0A= =/aht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC