[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DOCBOOK: Query.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jirka Kosek wrote: > documents -- doing really good, generaly usable and flexible conversion > from LaTeX to other formats like HTML is impossible. However this is > possible with DocBook where grammar of document is precisely defined by Say for someone who doesnt wish to define his/her own macros, wont packages like latex2html, pdflatex be able to generate the required format?? Also in real life, it is possible people are not *that* interested in defining their macros... Personally, I might find what LaTeX gives me is good enough? Will then too DocBook have any advantages over LaTeX? I might be over critical, but one of the reasons for that is I have a good WYSIWYG editor LYX for Latex, which even my non-technical people can use... But for DocBook, wont they face problems? I would like to hear your opinions on that. It is possible that I have been using LaTeX for some time and have started feeling comfortable with it :) Lastly, can any one tell me why I am not being able to generate dvi/ps files from my sgml files.. The commands I am giving are: $ jade -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets/html/docbook.dsl -t tex toc.sgm $jadetex toc.tex And the error I am getting is: "This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.1) jadetex: fatal: Could not undump 23165 4-byte item(s)." Any suggestions on what is going wrong here will be welcome. With Warm Regards Dhar PS: Hey, I have often posted on a number of mailing lists... But I guess this is the first time I have got such quick responses. Thanks Guys! :))
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC