[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem
Hi Norm, Okay, so now, what exactly does this new version of onechunk do? It looks like it just passes everything off to chunk.xsl. What is the onechunk param supposed to do? When I ran version 1.6 of onechunk.xsl against my test files, I got exactly what I'd expect from running the files against chunk.xsl: chunked HTML. I guess, from your comment in the new version of onechunk.xsl, that's what I should expect. Another thing that confuses me: I wasn't having this problem with 1.49. I had, admittedly, made a slight modification to the 1.49 onechunk.xsl file sheet. I had changed the include from chunk-common.xsl to chunk.xsl. I notice that in the transition from 1.49 to 1.50.0, you changed the includes and imports from <xsl:import href="autoidx.xsl"/> <xsl:include href="chunk.xsl"/> <xsl:include href="chunker.xsl"/> to <xsl:import href="chunk.xsl"/> So, being a stubborn old ex-Navy tech, I fell back on old troubleshooting methods. I swapped back to the earlier version (1.5) of onechunk.xsl and replaced the import with the includes and imports as they were in version 1.1 (with the exception, as shown above, of including chunk.xsl vice chunk-common.xsl). That worked. Any idea why that worked? Why were the include and import statements changed? Thanks. Dennis Grace Information Developer IBM Linux Technology Center (512) 838-3937 T/L 678-3937 cell: (512)-296-7830 dgrace@us.ibm.com Oh god comma I abhor self-consciousness. |---------+----------------------------> | | Norman Walsh | | | <ndw@nwalsh.com> | | | Sent by: Norman | | | Walsh | | | <ndw@mercury> | | | | | | | | | 05/15/02 04:09 PM| | | | |---------+----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Dennis Grace/Austin/IBM@IBMUS | | cc: veillard@redhat.com, docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org, Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org> | | Subject: Re: Onechunk problem | | | | | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| / Dennis Grace <dgrace@us.ibm.com> was heard to say: | Okay, all of this information about the refname is fascinating, but I'm | still confused by the problem with onechunk.xsl. It was botched. Fixed now in CVS. Er, I think :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The years teach us much which the http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | days never knew.--Emerson Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC