RE: [docbook-apps] Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for ISO9660

[Jeff Beal <jeff.beal@ansys.com>]

If you're going to be adding an FAQ on this, why don't you just explain the
entire filename logic for chunked files?  

With use.id.as.filename:
 1. dbhtml filename="name"
 2. ID
 3. bk??ch??s??

Without use.id.as.filename:
 1. dbhtml
 2. bk??ch??s??

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dpawson@nildram.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 5:16 AM
> To: Steinar Bang; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for
> ISO9660
> 
> 
> At 09:03 18/04/2003 +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
> 
> 
> >Well, personally I'm aware of the problem, and therefore keep my ids
> >short, and test the resulting chunked HTML on Win32 before releasing.
> >But it might bite someone else.
> >
> >Perhaps something for Dave Pawson's FAQ?  (it seems to be down right
> >now, so I couldn't check if it already had something there)
> 
> Been down for 24 hours now. Its the isp.
> 
> Can I check I've got this right?
>   Using id values for filenames in xslt output could screw those
> using 8.3 filenames?
> 
> Whilst talking about this, David Carlisle pointed out to me 
> the downside of
> using generate-id() targets, could change etc, not reliable.
> I could see his point, just wondered if anyone else has been  
> bitten by
> this problem?
>    Should it be frowned upon?
> 
> regards DaveP
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
>