[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Typograhpical treatment of glossterms
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Joachim Ziegler wrote: > I'm just wondering why a (inline) glossterm without a linkend gets > special typographical treatment in HTML and FO output whereas one with a > linkend gets not. (?) I see this problem on the FO side, but the HTML side is all italic as far as I can see. Can you give an example of a file where the HTML inlines are different? I think the FO side is a bug, since all other cases for inline glossterm use the 'inline.italseq' template, except that one that uses 'inline.charseq'. -- Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796 The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887 email: bobs@sco.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]