RE: [docbook-apps] Recusive <section/>'s and their conclusions

["Ruiter, Epco de (RBI-NL)" <Epco.de.Ruiter@reedbusiness.nl>]

You can easily use the same trick I've used to have an image for Tip with
hiding the Tip-title:

.tip  { 	BACKGROUND: url(stdimg/components/tip.gif) no-repeat 5pt
12pt;
	PADDING: 5px 5px 5px 100px; }

DIV.tip H3  { display: none }

Apart from that it's more correct (think semantics) to let the conclusion be
a section (with a title).

Keep in mind to keep layout and content apart (not always easy, some looks
can't be done without putting layout-code in DocBook-XML (for example
tables).

Epco

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitry V. Ketov [mailto:Dimitry.Ketov@avalon.ru]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:28 PM
> To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Recusive <section/>'s and their 
> conclusions
> 
> 
> It will be autogenerated by stylesheets, e.g. fixed 
> "Conclusion" title, without any 
> content-driven <title>'s text.
> 
> David Tolpin пишет:
> > 
> >>   <section>
> >>     <title/>
> >>   </section>
> >>
> >>   <para>CONCLUSION</para>
> >>
> >> </article>
> >>
> >> but due to current DTD restrictions i'm not able to do that.
> >> I DON'T want to use another section for CONCLUSION, cause 
> it haven't 
> >> got title that is mandatory for the section.
> >>
> >> What am i doing wrong? Is there any ways to solve this task?
> > 
> > How will the reader know that the last section is over and 
> he is into 
> > the conclusion, if it does not have a title?
>