Re: [docbook-apps] Re: blogging using DocBook articles or so ...

[Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>]

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:44:13 +0200
Jochen+oasis-open@Hayek.name wrote:

> > The wrapper is atom, not docbook, which I publish directly.
> 
> ure. A standard. Fine. Isn't that OPML-related? Rings a bell somehow.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt

> 
> But usually (I thought at least) the wrapper (i.e. the feed) does not
> contain the entire articles, but it only refers to the content.
> 
> But at least some feed providers restrict it to that, as far as I can
> say.

Not in my experience. 



> But maybe I got something fundamentally wrong.

Go find some rss or atom feeds and have a look at the structure. 


> 
> > From the above, you can see that the html header from docbook is all
> > redundant?
> 
> Not from the above,
> but if I want to keep the article separate, then yes.


I'm unsure what an atom feed reader would do with a link to docbook
source in the body. Try it?

> Separate articles, each written in DocBook, atom being the wrapper
> pointing to articles living for themselves, one by one.


Hand craft a feed and see what bloglines or something does with it
before you go further.


HTH



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk