[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [DocBook-publishers] Food for thought: Legal/Govt citations
On 07/11/2007, Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com> wrote: > For example, what is the best practice for marking up the following: > According to the Bank Holding Company Act (12 USC 1841(c)(2)(F))... > > Perhaps there is already support for this in DocBook, but I would guess > that some additional markup would be beneficial. What is 'normal' presentation format, i.e. could we work back from that? > > Thoughts? Answers? Rather than phrases, it's numbering that would have me concerned, especially if it's automated? Seemingly each govt, possibly each department, seems to have some crazy numbering scheme which may have seemed logical years ago but .... Lots of examples, then something like the docbook toc layout perhaps? book sect1 1 sect2 1.1 section 1.1.1 etc To give some flexible guidance to the stylesheets as to what form the numbering could/should take. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]