Re: [docbook-tc] Fw: informaltable inside table

["Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net>]

OK, I filed the RFE.  I don't think informaltable is allowed, as there is a schematron 
rule against it, but not against table.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
bobs@sagehill.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
To: <docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Fw: informaltable inside table

"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes:
> This message raised an issue that I'm not understanding.  It appears
> that the Cals table <entry> element in DocBook 5 does indeed permit
> <table>, but not <informaltable>.  I don't remember allowing <table>
> inside <entry>, so I'm wondering if this is a bug?

It's a bug. And informaltable is allowed too. Drat.