[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Proposal #2 for BNF/EBNF markup
/ "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com> was heard to say: | At 05:28 PM 4/5/00 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: | I hadn't intended for constraints to point out to other documents; the | constraintdef should be in the same document. It's fine with me if it's an | IDREF. Ok. | >I'm starting to think the semantic for 'nt' and 'constraint' | >should be that the generate content if empty (in which case they | >must have an IDREF (expressed as an xpointer)) or they can | >contain content. [Can you say #CONREF? :-)] | | That seems okay. Do we want to support pointers to constraints in other documents? If not, then I think constraint should be empty. | On the subject of <nt> vs. <nonterminal>, I agree that it's much more in | the DocBook style to call it the latter... Ok. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <firstname.lastname@example.org> | I have animal magnatism. When I go http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | outside, squirrels stick to my Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | clothes.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC