[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Proposal #2 for BNF/EBNF markup
At 11:39 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: >| >I'm starting to think the semantic for 'nt' and 'constraint' >| >should be that the generate content if empty (in which case they >| >must have an IDREF (expressed as an xpointer)) or they can >| >contain content. [Can you say #CONREF? :-)] >| >| That seems okay. > >Do we want to support pointers to constraints in other documents? >If not, then I think constraint should be empty. Sorry, I didn't catch that this paragraph referred to both 'nt' and 'constraint'. Yes, constraint should be empty. (You're already incorporating this into DocBook, right? Am I off the hook for doing any more designing, then? :-) Eve Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center elm @ east.sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC