[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re[2]: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
Hello David, Saturday, June 22, 2002, 9:11:03 PM, you wrote: DC> There's a list of fo renderers at DC> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/publishing.html#d DC> 0e65. Add to that list Antenna house (commercial): DC> http://www.antennahouse.com/. XEP (evaluation) it hangs parsing the FO file, (FOP works well with the same file) Epic Editor doesn't have an evaluation version and I don't trust in refunds ;-) I'm downloading Antenna right now, and I will only buy if it works well, of course. It's suprising there's no a good-free-easy tool to process FO, I think the best is FOP, but it's unfinished. I will try PassiveTex, but I think is too much complicated to install on a Windows system. So, I think it would be nice to a DocBook developer have something like this: -DocBook editor, like AbiWord (DocBook support is still in beta) with full support for DocBook. -With publishing features to save documents as HTML, PDF and several other formats. -Very easy an intuitive as another text editor -OpenSource and cross-platform Windows/Linux I think this program will rock! not only because is what I need, because any person will be able to use DocBook without XML, SGML knowledge ;-) Best Regards.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC