[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Issues with processing expectations of the proposedannotation element
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:13:22AM -0500, Michael Smith wrote: > I wouldn't be in favor of deprecating footnote either; the name is > very clear-- I think everybody understands exactly what it's for I think you're exactly using as an argument for keeping it the argument I'd use for trowing it, with a difference in formulation: everybody think they understand what it's for. Especially they sometimes complain when it's rendered as endnotes, just because they expect it to be "notes at the foot of my page", which is exactly a layout decision, and we're usually trying to stop users to think about the layout, when they write their document... -- Yann Dirson <Yann.Dirson@fr.alcove.com> http://www.alcove.com/ Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres Debian developer (dirson@debian.org) Développeur Debian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC