OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

docbook message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: DOCBOOK: shading cells [was: DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 18 Feb 2003]


At 14:35 2003 02 18 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----
>
>|      685511 shading/color support for tables
>
>For Scott's purposes, the PIs are probably a workable solution.
>
>BS: People could use roles for this and then customize the stylesheets.
>
>SC: We use processing instructions as well.
>
>BS: It's not really part of the semantic model of the element. There's
>no indication in the actual element that there's a semantic reason for
>it to be shaded. I can easily see role used as an alternative for
>this.
>
>NW: For the DocBook stylesheets, you'd have to use two PIs so it might
>make sense to have a common PI for both HTML and FO.
>
>SC: Maybe it makes sense to define some common processing
>instructions.
>
>NW: Maybe this would be a chance for us to say, "here use this one".
>
>ACTION: Norm to put releasein 4.3 or 5.0 or whatever's next on the agenda.


I'm not sure I follow what the discussion concluded, and I'm unclear on 
what the action item is.  Could someone clarify?

paul




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC