[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: shading cells [was: DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 18 Feb 2003]
At 14:35 2003 02 18 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---- > >| 685511 shading/color support for tables > >For Scott's purposes, the PIs are probably a workable solution. > >BS: People could use roles for this and then customize the stylesheets. > >SC: We use processing instructions as well. > >BS: It's not really part of the semantic model of the element. There's >no indication in the actual element that there's a semantic reason for >it to be shaded. I can easily see role used as an alternative for >this. > >NW: For the DocBook stylesheets, you'd have to use two PIs so it might >make sense to have a common PI for both HTML and FO. > >SC: Maybe it makes sense to define some common processing >instructions. > >NW: Maybe this would be a chance for us to say, "here use this one". > >ACTION: Norm to put releasein 4.3 or 5.0 or whatever's next on the agenda. I'm not sure I follow what the discussion concluded, and I'm unclear on what the action item is. Could someone clarify? paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC