[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: marking up keycaps according to their semantics
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> was heard to say: | It should be allowed for to the control key element to be empty: | | <keycombo action="simul"> | <keycap function="control"/> | <keycap>h</keycap> | </keycombo> | | So the change in the DTD would merely be to allow keycap to be empty, | and add an attribute. - From the RFE: What exactly? That is the question. At first I thought you were proposing only Control, Shift, Meta, and Alt. Though I suppose Command and Apple need to be in there as well. I've forgotten what the meta keys were on a 3270 and a VT100/220. Not to mention the Tectronix displays that I heard of but never used. * enter * alt (meta) * shift * ctrl * "arrow keys": up, right, down, left * escape * backspace * tab * space * delete * F1-12 perhaps also * help * page up / down * command-key (Mac) [etc?] We need to really nail these down. What's missing from this list: control, shift, meta, alt, command, apple, fn, esc, f1..f24, printscreen, sysreq, pause, break, windows, menu, backspace, home, pgup, pgdn, end, tab, backtab, capslock, up, down, left, right, ins, del And how does this proposal deal with double-shifted keys? What's the right markup in this proposal for "Ctrl-Alt-Backspace" and "Alt-Shift-I"? Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To the man who is afraid http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | everything rustles.--Sophocles Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+bye/OyltUcwYWjsRAm2RAJ94/CcTV1m4V39thc8dYuxO28fX5gCdFLA6 /VuPX4Vbvh7F403ZA/PPCsI= =szMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]